 |
|
|
EDITORIAL COMMENTS |
IMPEACHMENT & the PRIMARIES
— Alan Kobrin
"Impeachment...is NOT acceptable," [Barack Obama] said in an interview published by Associated Press. He went on to say, "you reserve impeachment for grave,...intentional breaches of the president's authority."
|
IMPEACHMENT is the ultimate questioning of how government is operating at its highest levels.
The Primary process tends to emphasize quite the opposite: conformity and not rocking the boat.
At a time of real grave crimes, it may well be that the electoral least serves the nation. Why? Just look at the behavior of the Democratic majority in Congress. One of the consistent arguments they have been made for NOT investigating the multiple self-admitted and likely crimes of this Administration.
The irony comes of course as candidates roam the country talking of better tomorrows while simultaneously ignoring screaming negative realities of today. In that sense ALL of the remaining candidates have shown themselves insensitive to glaring crimes, unfit for leadership.
Those of us who champion Saving the Constitution through Impeachment are the ones scolded, reprimanded or silenced, when not ignored. Not one of the remaining candidates mentions, much less questions the current government's role in torture, starting an illegal war of choice, or spying on US citizens, each of which would be grounds for Impeachment.
Barrack Obama's recent pronouncements on Impeachment are particularly troubling. The self-professed candidate of "change" would allow the violations of the Constitution and the separation of powers to stand. "Impeachment...is NOT acceptable," he said in an interview published by Associated Press. He went on to say, "you reserve impeachment for grave,...intentional breaches of the president's authority."
WHAT, then could he describe as grave or intentional breaches of authority when the Chief Executive first told the public that all wiretaps required court orders, then later admitted he was not using them. What about the resultant hundreds of thousands of deaths when the US unilaterally invaded Iraq without waiting for a second required UN resolution? How about the use of forged documents in a State of the Union message in order to press for war? Are any of those — even as accusations — grave enough to warrant hearings, Mr. would-be-president Obama?
You want change? You want hope? You want a firm foundation for a brighter future? Then join the MAJORITY of Americans in asking for impeachment hearings for Dick Cheney to begin at once.
The satisfaction of asking and knowing the answers to these many questions apply to any of the candidates. This should not be a contest of who best deflects criticism from our shores. Standing tall for this nation requires that questions be raised.
America deserves to know.
|
How is Impeachment like the "T-Cell" of Our Constitution? Read "Save Our Constitution" and get a downloadable flyer.
|
|
WHEN THEY SAY IT'S TOO LATE...
"[Andrew] Johnson was impeached three days after committing the offense for which he was impeached."
"The House began impeachment [against Nixon] on May 9, 1974, and passed the first of three articles of impeachment on July 27, 1974. Nixon resigned on August 8th."
|
There is a widespread myth that an impeachment cannot happen in the space of the nine months Bush and Cheney are scheduled to remain in office. But I'm unable to find any past impeachment that took as long as nine months. It's messy comparing one impeachment to another, as they are complicated and varying processes. But a few things are clear: most impeachment efforts achieve important results quickly, without actually achieving impeachment (think Elliot Spitzer or Alberto Gonzales); it is not uncommon for impeachment efforts to begin later in an administration than where we are now (think Andrew Johnson, Herbert Hoover, Harry Truman); while preliminary investigations of the sort that have been done on Bush and Cheney for the past year and a half can be dragged out for months, impeachments tend not to last long; and while Senate trials can be delayed and dragged out for many months, impeachments in the House tend to be short-lived events.
An impeachment of Bush and/or Cheney for an indisputable offense (refusing subpoenas, refusing to enforce contempt citations, rewriting laws with signing statements, openly violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, etc.) could take literally one day. Such a thing would not be unprecedented. President Andrew Johnson was impeached three days after the offense for which he was impeached. Senator William Blount was impeached four days after the offense for which he was impeached.
There is no reason impeachment hearings on Cheney or Bush should be limited to the simplest crimes or rushed through at top speed. Public education might benefit from a slower process. My point is only that it is possible to impeach rapidly. A senate trial can also serve as an educational forum. Below are some of the dates I've been able to find on how long past impeachments have taken. A better researcher might add to this collection. In several cases, I have dates for the duration of the Senate trial, but not for the House impeachment, the duration of which may in fact have been negligible.
A Senate trial can also be completed quickly, and there is no requirement or precedent for including every obvious impeachable offense. (In fact, there is no precedent for elected officials being guilty of so many obvious impeachable offenses or for the public being so aware of impeachable offenses prior to an impeachment.) The Senate expelled Blount the day after he was impeached. Judge Halsted Ritter's Senate trial took 11 days. Judge John Pickering's trial took nine days. Judge James Peck's trial took three days. Judge West Humphreys' trial took one day.
Two presidents have been impeached: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton.
Johnson was impeached three days after committing the offense for which he was impeached, and prior to drafting articles of impeachment. Within a week, a committee drew up charges, and 11 days after the offense, the House delivered the charges to the Senate. The trial process began the next day, and in under three months it was over.
The House began impeachment procedures for Bill Clinton on October 8, 1998, and impeached him on December 19th. The Senate trial lasted from January 14, 1999, to February 12, 1999. The whole four-month farce took less than half the time remaining to Bush and Cheney.
Of the presidential impeachment movements that did not reach impeachment, the most well-known is that against Richard Nixon. The House began impeachment on May 9, 1974, and passed the first of three articles of impeachment on July 27, 1974. Nixon resigned on August 8th. Of course there were lots of preliminary investigations, but those have already been done for Bush and Cheney.
Most impeachments have not been against presidents, but rather judges, cabinet officers, senators. These impeachments seem to take about as long as presidential impeachment do, and offer no support to the myth of long impeachments. In addition, much other business has been accomplished at the same time as these impeachments.
On July 3, 1797, evidence of an offense by Senator William Blount became known. Four days later, the House impeached him and the next day the Senate expelled him.
Evidence of an offense by Judge John Pickering became known on February 4, 1803, and the House voted to impeach him on March 2, 1803. The Senate didn't try him for another year, but spent 9 days on it when it did so.
Supreme Court justice Samuel Chase was impeached in late 1804 (I don't know how long the impeachment took) and 30 days later he was tried in the Senate, which completed the trial on March 1, 1805.
Judge James Peck was impeached on April 24, 1830, a month after the Judiciary Committee recommended it. The Senate took up the trial the following January and spent three days on it.
Judge West H. Humphreys was impeached on May 19, 1862. The Senate tried and convicted him in one day on June 26, 1862.
Secretary of War William W. Belknap was impeached on March 2, 1876, and the Senate trial was completed on August 1, 1876.
Judge Charles Swayne was impeached on December 14, 1904, and his trial was over on February 27, 1905.
Judge Robert W. Archbald was impeached on July 13, 1912, and the Senate trial was over on January 13, 1913.
Judge Harold Louderback resigned before his impeachment went to trial.
Judge Halsted L. Ritter was impeached on March 2, 1936, and the 11-day Senate trial ended on April 17th of the same year.
Judge Harry E. Claiborne was impeached on July 22, 1986, and the trial ended on October 9, 1986.
Then Judge and now Congressman Alcee L. Hastings, was impeached on August 3, 1988, and the Senate trial was over on October 20, 1988.
Judge Walter L. Nixon was impeached on May 10, 1989, and the Senate trial was completed on November 3, 1989.
There are nine months remaining to Bush and Cheney. If you think that is a short time, you are not a mother. |
|
